Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding at logarithmic function" » "coder coding and logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding _ logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding of logarithmic function" (Expand search), "modern coding at logarithmic function" (Expand search), "color coding at logarithmic function" (Expand search), "odor coding at logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding an logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder bonding at logarithmic function" (Expand search)
"in pieces python python programming" » "in lines python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in pieces pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in pieces piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pieces pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pieces python python programming" (Expand search), "in piles python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding at logarithmic function") OR ("in pieces python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding at logarithmic function\") OR (\"in pieces python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding at logarithmic function ) OR ( in pieces python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding at logarithmic function") OR ("in pieces python python programming"))*.