Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding at algorithmic functions" » "coder coding at logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding at logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding at algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder coding an algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding data algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding and algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "modern coding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "color coding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "odor coding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder bonding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in opinion python python programming" » "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in opinion pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in opinion piton python programming" (Expand search), "in opinion pitons python programming" (Expand search), "and opinion python python programming" (Expand search), "of opinion python python programming" (Expand search), "_ opinion python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding at algorithmic functions") OR ("in opinion python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding at algorithmic functions\") OR (\"in opinion python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding at algorithmic functions ) OR ( in opinion python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding at algorithmic functions") OR ("in opinion python python programming"))*.