Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding at algorithmic functions" » "coder coding at logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding at logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding at algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder coding an algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding data algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding and algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "modern coding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "color coding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "odor coding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder bonding at algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ piton python python programming" » "_ piton pythons python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton pytm python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ in python python programming" (Expand search), "_ with python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding at algorithmic functions\") OR (\"_ piton python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding at algorithmic functions ) OR ( _ piton python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding at algorithmic functions") OR ("_ piton python python programming"))*.