Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding and duplicate coverage" » "coder coding and duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding and application coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding and duplication coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding and silicate coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding of duplicate coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding and duplicate coverage" (Expand search), "color coding and duplicate coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding and duplicate coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding rna duplicate coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding and duplicate coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding and duplicate coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding and duplicate coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding and duplicate coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.