Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding and dense coding" » "modern coding and dense coding" (Expand search), "color coding and dense coding" (Expand search), "odor coding and dense coding" (Expand search), "coder coding and gene coding" (Expand search), "coder coding and dense cropping" (Expand search), "coder coding and dense bovine" (Expand search), "coder coding rna dense coding" (Expand search), "coder coding and sense coding" (Expand search), "coder coding and defense coding" (Expand search), "coder coding and dengue coding" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding and dense coding\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding and dense coding ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding and dense coding") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.