Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder world samples processing" » "coder coder world sample processing" (Expand search), "coder coder world complex processing" (Expand search), "coder coder world samples processed" (Expand search), "coder coder wood samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder old samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder worn samples processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder world samples processing" (Expand search), "code code world samples processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec world samples processing" (Expand search), "coder modern world samples processing" (Expand search), "coder closer world samples processing" (Expand search), "coder power world samples processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder world samples processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder world samples processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder world samples processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder world samples processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.