Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder works sample processing" » "coder coder works image processing" (Expand search), "coder coder works pre processing" (Expand search), "coder coder works waste processing" (Expand search), "coder coder work sample processing" (Expand search), "coder coder workers sample processing" (Expand search), "coder coder working sample processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder works sample processing" (Expand search), "code code works sample processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec works sample processing" (Expand search), "coder code works sample processing" (Expand search), "coder code words sample processing" (Expand search), "coder over works sample processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder works sample processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder works sample processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder works sample processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder works sample processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.