Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder working theory processing" » "coder coder working their processing" (Expand search), "coder coder working the processing" (Expand search), "coder coder working query processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dworkin's theory processing" (Expand search), "coder coder foraging theory processing" (Expand search), "coder coder working memory processing" (Expand search), "coder cone working theory processing" (Expand search), "coder power working theory processing" (Expand search), "coder under working theory processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder working theory processing" (Expand search), "code code working theory processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec working theory processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder working theory processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder working theory processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder working theory processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder working theory processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.