Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder working process effect" » "coder coder making process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder work process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder working process effects" (Expand search), "coder coder working processing effect" (Expand search), "coder coder working processes effects" (Expand search), "coder cone working process effect" (Expand search), "coder power working process effect" (Expand search), "coder under working process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder working process effect" (Expand search), "code code working process effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec working process effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder working process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder working process effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder working process effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder working process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.