Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder working on programming" » "coder coder working in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder working cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder working and programming" (Expand search), "coder cone working on programming" (Expand search), "coder power working on programming" (Expand search), "coder under working on programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder working on programming" (Expand search), "code code working on programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec working on programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on python python pythin programming" (Expand search), "on python python pythcone programming" (Expand search), "on python python pythand programming" (Expand search), "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder working on programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder working on programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder working on programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder working on programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.