Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder working dinamic programming" » "coder coder working dynamic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder working dynamic programing" (Expand search), "coder coder working genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder docking dinamica programming" (Expand search), "coder coder docking dinamico programming" (Expand search), "coder coder networking dynamic programming" (Expand search), "coder cone working dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder power working dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder under working dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder working dinamic programming" (Expand search), "code code working dinamic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec working dinamic programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder working dinamic programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder working dinamic programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder working dinamic programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder working dinamic programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.