Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder worked pulse processing" » "coder coder worked pulp processing" (Expand search), "coder coder worked pre processing" (Expand search), "coder coder worked juice processing" (Expand search), "coder older worker pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder cold worked pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder code works pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder worked pulse processing" (Expand search), "code code worked pulse processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec worked pulse processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder worked pulse processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder worked pulse processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder worked pulse processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder worked pulse processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.