Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder word embedding coverage" » "coder coder word embedding averages" (Expand search), "coder coder word embedding collagen" (Expand search), "coder coder word embeddings coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoder word embedding coverage" (Expand search), "code code word embedding coverage" (Expand search), "decoder codec word embedding coverage" (Expand search), "coder color word embedding coverage" (Expand search), "coder code words embedding coverage" (Expand search), "coder counter word embedding coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder word embedding coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder word embedding coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder word embedding coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder word embedding coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.