Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder with sequence processing" » "coder coder with sentence processing" (Expand search), "coder coder with science processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder with sequence processing" (Expand search), "code code with sequence processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec with sequence processing" (Expand search), "coder codes with sequence processing" (Expand search), "coder code with sequence processing" (Expand search), "coder cover with sequence processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder with sequence processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder with sequence processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder with sequence processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder with sequence processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.