Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder with dependent programming" » "coder coder with independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder with dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder with element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder with dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder path dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder acth dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder with dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code with dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec with dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder codes with dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder code with dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder cover with dependent programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder with dependent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder with dependent programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder with dependent programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder with dependent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.