Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder with coarse coding" » "coder coder with sparse coding" (Expand search), "coder coder with clause coding" (Expand search), "coder coder with source coding" (Expand search), "coder decoder with coarse coding" (Expand search), "code code with coarse coding" (Expand search), "decoder codec with coarse coding" (Expand search), "coder coder with cocaine coding" (Expand search), "coder codes with coarse coding" (Expand search), "coder code with coarse coding" (Expand search), "coder cover with coarse coding" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder with coarse coding") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder with coarse coding\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder with coarse coding ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder with coarse coding") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.