Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder while prediction process" » "coder coder while production process" (Expand search), "coder coder while reduction process" (Expand search), "coder coder while predictive process" (Expand search), "coder coder wide prediction process" (Expand search), "coder coder pile prediction process" (Expand search), "coder coder while predicting process" (Expand search), "coder decoder while prediction process" (Expand search), "code code while prediction process" (Expand search), "decoder codec while prediction process" (Expand search), "coder power while prediction process" (Expand search), "coder gender while prediction process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder while prediction process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder while prediction process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder while prediction process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder while prediction process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.