Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder while predicting processing" » "coder coder while predictive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder while printing processing" (Expand search), "coder coder while predicting progression" (Expand search), "coder coder while protecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder while reducing processing" (Expand search), "coder coder the predicting processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder while predicting processing" (Expand search), "code code while predicting processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec while predicting processing" (Expand search), "coder power while predicting processing" (Expand search), "coder gender while predicting processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder while predicting processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder while predicting processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder while predicting processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder while predicting processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.