Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder weight efficient programming" » "coder coder weight efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coder weight fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder weight coefficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coder weight efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder coder height coefficient programming" (Expand search), "coder powder weight efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder over weight efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder power weight efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder weight efficient programming" (Expand search), "code code weight efficient programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec weight efficient programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder weight efficient programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder weight efficient programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder weight efficient programming ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder weight efficient programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.