Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"coder coder was set programming" » "coder coder was based programming" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder was agent programming" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder was _ programming" (Expandir a busca), "coder decoder was set programming" (Expandir a busca), "code code was set programming" (Expandir a busca), "decoder codec was set programming" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder was left programming" (Expandir a busca)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in piton python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in pitons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "_ python python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("coder coder was set programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"coder coder was set programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( coder coder was set programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adicionar um caractere curinga pode recuperar variações da palavra buscada: (("coder coder was set programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.