Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder was affecting processing" » "coder coder was affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder was affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder was harvesting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder waves affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder laws affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dams affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder was affecting processing" (Expand search), "code code was affecting processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec was affecting processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder was affecting processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder was affecting processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder was affecting processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder was affecting processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.