Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder walking status problem" » "coder coder working status problem" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking status problem" (Expand search), "coder coder walking paths problem" (Expand search), "coder coder walking stacks problem" (Expand search), "coder coder walking state problem" (Expand search), "coder coder walking stars problem" (Expand search), "coder water walking status problem" (Expand search), "coder after walking status problem" (Expand search), "coder or walking status problem" (Expand search), "coder decoder walking status problem" (Expand search), "code code walking status problem" (Expand search), "decoder codec walking status problem" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder walking status problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder walking status problem\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder walking status problem ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder walking status problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.