Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder via integer programming" » "coder coder via linear programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder via integer programming" (Expand search), "code code via integer programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec via integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder via internet programming" (Expand search), "coder coder with integer programming" (Expand search), "coder codes via integer programming" (Expand search), "coder poder via integer programming" (Expand search), "coder code via integer programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder via integer programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder via integer programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder via integer programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder via integer programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.