Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder valence dependent programming" » "coder coder valence independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder valence dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder valence element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder velhice dependente programming" (Expand search), "coder coder voltage dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder outer valence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder valence dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code valence dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec valence dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder valence dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder valence dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder valence dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder valence dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.