Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using turing machine" » "coder coder using using machine" (Expand search), "coder coder using testing machine" (Expand search), "coder coder using learning machine" (Expand search), "coder coder using tuning machine" (Expand search), "coder coder using urine machine" (Expand search), "coder coder using murine machine" (Expand search), "coder decoder using turing machine" (Expand search), "code code using turing machine" (Expand search), "decoder codec using turing machine" (Expand search), "coder coders using turing machine" (Expand search), "coder cover using turing machine" (Expand search), "coder code using turing machine" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using turing machine") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using turing machine\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using turing machine ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using turing machine") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.