Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using syntactic complexity" » "coder coder using synthetic complexity" (Expand search), "coder coder using static complexity" (Expand search), "coder coder in syntactic complexity" (Expand search), "coder decoder using syntactic complexity" (Expand search), "code code using syntactic complexity" (Expand search), "decoder codec using syntactic complexity" (Expand search), "coder coders using syntactic complexity" (Expand search), "coder cover using syntactic complexity" (Expand search), "coder code using syntactic complexity" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using syntactic complexity\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using syntactic complexity ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using syntactic complexity") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.