Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using subsampling data" » "coder coder and subsampling data" (Expand search), "coder coder using subsampling ratio" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling data" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling date" (Expand search), "coder decoder using subsampling data" (Expand search), "code code using subsampling data" (Expand search), "decoder codec using subsampling data" (Expand search), "coder coders using subsampling data" (Expand search), "coder cover using subsampling data" (Expand search), "coder code using subsampling data" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using subsampling data") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using subsampling data\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using subsampling data ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using subsampling data") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.