Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using stimulative function" » "coder coder using legislative function" (Expand search), "coder coder using normative function" (Expand search), "coder coder using stimulus function" (Expand search), "coder coder using simulation function" (Expand search), "coder coder using simulate function" (Expand search), "coder coder using stimulated function" (Expand search), "coder decoder using stimulative function" (Expand search), "code code using stimulative function" (Expand search), "decoder codec using stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder coders using stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder cover using stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder code using stimulative function" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using stimulative function") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using stimulative function\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using stimulative function ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using stimulative function") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.