Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using signal sampling" » "coder coder using digital sampling" (Expand search), "coder coder using spatial sampling" (Expand search), "coder coder using single sampling" (Expand search), "coder decoder using signal sampling" (Expand search), "code code using signal sampling" (Expand search), "decoder codec using signal sampling" (Expand search), "coder coders using signal sampling" (Expand search), "coder cover using signal sampling" (Expand search), "coder code using signal sampling" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using signal sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using signal sampling\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using signal sampling ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using signal sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.