Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequential processes" » "coder coder using sequential process" (Expand search), "coder coder using referential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using spatial processes" (Expand search), "coder coder in sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder and sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder with sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequential processes" (Expand search), "code code using sequential processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder code using sequential processes" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sequential processes") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequential processes\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequential processes ) OR ( api in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sequential processes") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.