Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequential procedures" » "coder coder using sequential procedure" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequencing procedures" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder in sequential procedures" (Expand search), "coder coder and sequential procedures" (Expand search), "coder coder with sequential procedures" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequential procedures" (Expand search), "code code using sequential procedures" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequential procedures" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequential procedures" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequential procedures" (Expand search), "coder code using sequential procedures" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sequential procedures") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequential procedures\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequential procedures ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sequential procedures") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.