Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequence model" » "coder coder using frequency model" (Expand search), "coder coder single sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coder mixing sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequencia modelos" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequential model" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequence model" (Expand search), "code code using sequence model" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence model" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequence model\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequence model ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sequence model") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.