Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequence model" » "coder coder using frequency model" (Expand search), "coder coder single sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coder mixing sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequential model" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequence model" (Expand search), "code code using sequence model" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence model" (Expand search)
"api python piton python programming" » "api python python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api python editor python programming" (Expand search), "api python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api python in python programming" (Expand search), "api python with python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python piton python programming" (Expand search), "manim python piton python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sequence model") OR ("api python piton python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequence model\") OR (\"api python piton python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequence model ) OR ( api python piton python programming ))*.