Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequence miner" » "coder coder using frequency miner" (Expand search), "coder coder single sequence miner" (Expand search), "coder coder mixing sequence miner" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequence mining" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequence model" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequence aligners" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequence miner" (Expand search), "code code using sequence miner" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequence miner" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequence miner" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequence miner" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence miner" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sequence miner") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequence miner\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequence miner ) OR ( api in python python programming ))*.