Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequence effects" » "coder coder using frequency effects" (Expand search), "coder coder single sequence effects" (Expand search), "coder coder mixing sequence effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequence effects" (Expand search), "code code using sequence effects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequence effects" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequence effects" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequence effects" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence effects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sequence effects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequence effects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequence effects ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.