Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequence detector" » "coder coder using sequence detection" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequence detected" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequences detected" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency detector" (Expand search), "coder coder single sequence detector" (Expand search), "coder coder mixing sequence detector" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequence detector" (Expand search), "code code using sequence detector" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequence detector" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequence detector" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequence detector" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence detector" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sequence detector") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequence detector\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequence detector ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.