Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using scanning process" » "coder coder using planning process" (Expand search), "coder coder using tanning process" (Expand search), "coder coder using spinning process" (Expand search), "coder decoder using scanning process" (Expand search), "code code using scanning process" (Expand search), "decoder codec using scanning process" (Expand search), "coder coders using scanning process" (Expand search), "coder cover using scanning process" (Expand search), "coder code using scanning process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using scanning process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using scanning process ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using scanning process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.