Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sampling gaps" » "coder coder using subsampling gaps" (Expand search), "coder coder using saline gaps" (Expand search), "coder coder sinus sampling gaps" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling and" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling bias" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling grid" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sampling gaps" (Expand search), "code code using sampling gaps" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sampling gaps" (Expand search), "coder coders using sampling gaps" (Expand search), "coder cover using sampling gaps" (Expand search), "coder code using sampling gaps" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sampling gaps") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sampling gaps\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sampling gaps ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sampling gaps") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.