Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sampling effect" » "coder coder using sampling effort" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling efforts" (Expand search), "coder coder using coupling effect" (Expand search), "coder coder using subsampling effect" (Expand search), "coder coder using saline effect" (Expand search), "coder coder sinus sampling effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sampling effect" (Expand search), "code code using sampling effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sampling effect" (Expand search), "coder coders using sampling effect" (Expand search), "coder cover using sampling effect" (Expand search), "coder code using sampling effect" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using sampling effect") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sampling effect\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sampling effect ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sampling effect") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.