Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using samples data" » "coder coder using simple data" (Expand search), "coder coder cutting samples data" (Expand search), "coder coder lung samples data" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampled data" (Expand search), "coder coder using sample data" (Expand search), "coder coder using samples carta" (Expand search), "coder decoder using samples data" (Expand search), "code code using samples data" (Expand search), "decoder codec using samples data" (Expand search), "coder coders using samples data" (Expand search), "coder cover using samples data" (Expand search), "coder code using samples data" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using samples data") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using samples data\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using samples data ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using samples data") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.