Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sample decomposition" » "coder coder using value decomposition" (Expand search), "coder coder using mode decomposition" (Expand search), "coder coder using and decomposition" (Expand search), "coder coder using samples decomposition" (Expand search), "coder coder using simple decomposition" (Expand search), "coder coder using simplex decomposition" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sample decomposition" (Expand search), "code code using sample decomposition" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sample decomposition" (Expand search), "coder coders using sample decomposition" (Expand search), "coder cover using sample decomposition" (Expand search), "coder code using sample decomposition" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sample decomposition\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sample decomposition ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sample decomposition") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.