Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using recurrent content" » "coder coder using recurrent contexts" (Expand search), "coder coder using current content" (Expand search), "coder coder using recurrent potent" (Expand search), "coder coder in recurrent content" (Expand search), "coder decoder using recurrent content" (Expand search), "code code using recurrent content" (Expand search), "decoder codec using recurrent content" (Expand search), "coder coders using recurrent content" (Expand search), "coder cover using recurrent content" (Expand search), "coder code using recurrent content" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using recurrent content") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using recurrent content\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using recurrent content ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using recurrent content") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.