Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using recurrence processing" » "coder coder using recurrence progression" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequence processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using recursive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using reference processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "code code using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder coders using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder cover using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder code using recurrence processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using recurrence processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using recurrence processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using recurrence processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using recurrence processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.