Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using pulse processing" » "coder coder using pulp processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using pre processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using juice processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder using pulse processing" (Expand search), "code code using pulse processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec using pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder coders using pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder cover using pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder code using pulse processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using pulsed processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using pure processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using public processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using pulse processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using pulse processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using pulse processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using pulse processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.