Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using ostensible objects" » "coder coder using ostensive objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using orientable objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using tangible objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using extensible objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using tensile objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using intensive objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder using ostensible objects" (Expand search), "code code using ostensible objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec using ostensible objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using ostensible objects" (Expand search), "coder cover using ostensible objects" (Expand search), "coder code using ostensible objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using ostensible objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using ostensible objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using ostensible objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using ostensible objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.