Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using optical process" » "coder coder using optimal process" (Expand search), "coder coder using optical processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using optical processor" (Expand search), "coder decoder using optical process" (Expand search), "code code using optical process" (Expand search), "decoder codec using optical process" (Expand search), "coder coders using optical process" (Expand search), "coder cover using optical process" (Expand search), "coder code using optical process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using optical process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using optical process ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using optical process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.