Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using nonsampling errors" » "coder coder using sampling errors" (Expand search), "coder coder using sampling error" (Expand search), "coder coder using subsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder coder and nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder decoder using nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "code code using nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "decoder codec using nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder coders using nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder cover using nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder code using nonsampling errors" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using nonsampling errors") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using nonsampling errors\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using nonsampling errors ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using nonsampling errors") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.