Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder using new object" » "coder decoder using new object" (Expand search), "code code using new object" (Expand search), "decoder codec using new object" (Expand search), "coder coders using new object" (Expand search), "coder cover using new object" (Expand search), "coder code using new object" (Expand search), "coder coder using new objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using new subject" (Expand search), "coder coder using view object" (Expand search), "coder coder using near object" (Expand search), "coder coder using non object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using new object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using new object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using new object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using new object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.