Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using modulation functions" » "coder coder using modulation function" (Expand search), "coder coder using simulation functions" (Expand search), "coder coder using population function" (Expand search), "coder coder using population functions" (Expand search), "coder coder routing modulation functions" (Expand search), "coder coder keying modulation functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder using modulation functions" (Expand search), "code code using modulation functions" (Expand search), "decoder codec using modulation functions" (Expand search), "coder coders using modulation functions" (Expand search), "coder cover using modulation functions" (Expand search), "coder code using modulation functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using modulation functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using modulation functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using modulation functions ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using modulation functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.