Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using mine processes" » "coder coder using mind processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using like processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using life processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder using mine processes" (Expand search), "code code using mine processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec using mine processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using mine processes" (Expand search), "coder cover using mine processes" (Expand search), "coder code using mine processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using mini processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using mice processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using marine processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder using mine processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using mine processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using mine processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using mine processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.